ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
C. R. Bell, N. P. Oberle, W. Rohsenow, N. Todreas, C. Tso
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 53 | Number 4 | April 1974 | Pages 458-465
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE74-A23376
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of studies was made of bubble nucleation by fission fragments and fast neutrons. The experimental work was conducted by a liquid suspension method in a pressure chamber designed to provide for visual determination of the onset of nucleation. The minimum superheat necessary for nucleation of visible bubbles was measured in water and propylene glycol. An analytic prediction method for the superheat threshold is presented, utilizing the “thermal spike” theory of Seitz and Rayleigh’s criteria for instability of a vapor jet in liquid. This method predicts that the important parameter a, equal to the ratio of the track length in which net energy must be deposited to the critical bubble radius, should equal 6.07. By this analysis, this value is independent of the type of thermal-spike-producing radiation, the type of fluid, and the system condition. The experimental data from this investigation and all other published data were examined to determine the applicable a values. This examination did not result in identification of a values consistent with the proposed prediction. Reasons for the deviation of the data from predictions are discussed, but the basis of the deviations cannot be resolved.