ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
General Atomics marks completion of ITER’s superconducting fusion magnet
General Atomics last week celebrated the completion of the central solenoid modules for the ITER reactor being built in southern France. Designed to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion power, the ITER tokamak will be the world’s largest experimental fusion facility.
Seppo Salo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 50 | Number 1 | January 1973 | Pages 46-52
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A22587
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
There have been some weak points in the use of modern control theory in xenon shutdown problems. The aim of this paper is to show how Pontryagin’s maximum principle should be applied to these problems. To do this, two special problems have been picked up and solved completely. It is shown that the solution to the energy optimal xenon shutdown problem of Rosztoczy is not a bang-bang control as proposed by Rosztoczy even when the xenon restraint is omitted. The actual optimum control includes a phase with continuously varying control. Further, numerical examples are given to show that the difference in the costs between the optimum control and the control proposed by Rosztoczy is negligible. The other problem considered is the energy optimal xenon shutdown of Lewins et al. It is shown that the solution can be found analytically which gives a slight improvement to their analysis.