ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
R. C. Lloyd, E. D. Clayton, L. E. Hansen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 3 | July 1972 | Pages 300-304
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22487
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed to establish the effect of a soluble neutron absorber (gadolinium nitrate) on the criticality of plutonium nitrate solutions. The solutions contained plutonium at concentrations of ∼116 g Pu/liter and at ∼363 g Pu/liter. Measured quantities of gadolinium nitrate were mixed with these solutions to produce changes in critical solution height within a 24-in. -diam water-reflected cylinder. Gadolinium concentrations up to 20.25 g Gd/liter were used and the effect determined through the observed change in height. Monte Carlo calculations were used to compute the criticality factors (keff’s) for each of the measured critical configurations. The computed factors were below unity in each case (largest departure about 2% less than unity). The gadolinium proved to be an effective neutron absorber. Its effectiveness decreased significantly, however, in the higher plutonium concentration and faster neutron spectrum. Although comparable values of k∞ were computed (1.603 and 1.503) for the two plutonium concentrations in the experiments, the calculations show 2.4 g Gd/liter would be required to reduce k∞ to unity in the first case, whereas about 72 g Gd/liter would have been required in the second (316 g Pu/liter solution). Curves were prepared showing the computed quantities of gadolinium required to reduce k∞ to unity as a function of plutonium concentration. Also included are computed critical radii for infinitely long cylinders of plutonium nitrate solution for several different gadolinium concentrations. There was no evidence of chemical instability (or precipitation) of the gadolinium in the plutonium nitrate solution during the course of the experiments and over a 1-mo long test (a question of concern in using soluble poison for criticality control).