ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Zbigniew Weiss
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 3 | July 1972 | Pages 235-247
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In one-dimensional systems which consist of N nodes, the two N response matrix equations for the partial currents through the node interfaces have been transformed into a set of N three-point equations with the total in-current per node as the new variable. The resulting coefficients which describe the coupling between neighboring nodes are expressed in terms of the reflection and transmission matrices of the invariant imbedding theory. These coupling coefficients can be compared with those of other nodal equations. In the case of slab geometry this has been illustrated by a direct comparison with the familiar finite difference formulation with the average flux per node as the dependent variable. Also the relation between the method presented here and the so-called rigorous finite difference equations has been established. The advantage of this method lies in the fact that the flexibility of the response matrix methods—which describe the nodes in terms of invariant imbedding concepts—has been condensed into the conventional three-point finite difference scheme, for which many well-established solution methods exist.