ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS 2023)
May 7–11, 2023
Idaho Falls, ID|Snake River Event Center
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2023
Jan 2023
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2023
Nuclear Technology
April 2023
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The blossoming of cooperation between the U.S. and Canada
The United States and Canadian nuclear industries used to be an example of how two independent teams of engineers facing an identical problem—making electricity from uranium—could come up with completely different answers. In the 1950s, Canada began designing a reactor with tubes, heavy water, and natural uranium, while in the U.S. it was big pots of light water and enriched uranium.
But 80 years later, there is a remarkable convergence. The North American push for a new generation of nuclear reactors, mostly small modular reactors (SMRs), is becoming binational, with U.S. and Canadian companies seeking markets and regulatory certification on both sides of the border and in many cases sourcing key components in the other country.
Eleodor Nichita
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 175 | Number 2 | October 2013 | Pages 157-171
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-59
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Modern analysis of nuclear reactor transients uses space-time reactor kinetics methods. In the Canadian nuclear industry, safety analysis calculations use almost exclusively the improved quasi-static (IQS) flux factorization method. The IQS method, like all methods based on flux factorization, relies on calculating effective point-kinetics parameters, which dominate the time behavior of the flux, using adjoint-weighted integrals. The accuracy of the adjoint representation influences the accuracy of the effective kinetics parameters.Routine full-core calculations are not performed using detailed models and transport theory, but rather using a cell-homogenized model and two-group diffusion theory. This work evaluates the effect of homogenization and group condensation on the calculated effective kinetics parameters of an equilibrium CANDU core.Results show that homogenization combined with group condensation introduces a positive bias of ~5% in the effective delayed neutron fraction over a wide range of discharge burnups. Homogenization alone induces a positive bias of only ~2%.The bias in the effective generation time is <1% for all studied discharge burnups, and its effect on the results of a positive-reactivity transient is found to be negligible, with differences being caused solely by the effective delayed neutron fraction bias. The fractional delayed neutron fraction bias for the equilibrium core is found to be very close to that for a fresh-fuel core. However, because of the lower effective delayed neutron fraction of the equilibrium core, the effects of the bias are larger for the equilibrium core than for the fresh-fuel core. For a sample positive-reactivity transient, the maximum power is found to be underestimated by 9% for the fresh core and by 14% for the equilibrium core as a consequence of homogenization and group condensation.
