ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Ken Nakajima, Masanori Akai, Takenori Suzaki
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 116 | Number 2 | February 1994 | Pages 138-146
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-A21489
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modified conversion ratio is defined as the ratio of 238U captures to total fission. Gamma-ray spectrometry of irradiated fuel rods has been introduced to measure this quantity in two types of water-moderated low-enriched UO2 cores: the standard core, called the 1.42S core, and a tight-lattice core, called the 0.56S core. The water moderator-to-fuel volume ratios Vm/Vf of the cores are 1.420 and 0.564, respectively. As no activation foil is used in this method, no corrections are needed for the neutron self-shielding and neutron flux depression that are caused by such a foil. Instead, the gamma-ray self-shielding effect due to the fuel rod must be corrected. The modified conversion ratio is measured by this method are 0.457 for the 1.42S core and 0.724 for the 0.56S core. The errors in the experimental results are estimated to be∼3%. Computer analyses using the VIM continuous-energy Monte Carlo code with the JENDL-2 library show that the calculated value is ∼6% larger than the experimental one for the tight-lattice 0.56S core.