ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
S. Pelloni
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 82 | Number 4 | December 1982 | Pages 458-461
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A21459
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this Note a new iterative method for solving the monoenergetic diffusion equation is presented. Experience has shown that the usual iterative methods used to solve the resulting equations either do not converge at all or the number of inner iterations becomes too large when a high-order approximation is used for the spatial flux. Our aim therefore has been to develop a new iterative method that leads to a small number of iterations even for a high order of spatial flux approximation. The present method is additionally expedited using Chebyshev or Wagner and Andrzejewski procedures, which are compared.The SAPHIR benchmark test case with a fixed volume source was used for calculations because it is difficult to converge. It is shown that the present method needs almost the same number of iterations for Lagrangian flux approximation of first to fourth order. This number is smaller than 53. The Chebyshev procedure, which was the most effective, halved the number of inner iterations.