ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
W. Reed Johnson, Daniel H. Risher, James E. Rogers, William L. Thompson
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 43 | Number 1 | January 1971 | Pages 32-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE71-A21243
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Well-collimated beams of thermal-neutron-capture gamma rays from titanium and nickel, having average energies of about 6 and 8 MeV, respectively, were used to measure narrow-beam and total gamma-ray dose attenuation. Slab shields of lead, iron, and concrete were investigated for normal and oblique beam incidence. Total dose measurements were made by traversing an exposure-responsive detector through a plane behind and parallel to the shield. Monte Carlo and moments-method calculations were used to compare analytical and experimental total dose results. Good agreement was found for iron and concrete shields, but experimental results for the lead shield were higher than those predicted by the moments method by a factor of ∼1.2 for 6 MeV and ∼1.5 for 8 MeV. The reason for this disagreement is believed to be primarily bremsstrah-lung produced by energetic secondary electrons slowing down in lead.