ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
J. B. Yasinsky
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 39 | Number 2 | February 1970 | Pages 241-256
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21204
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The results of a numerical study as to the adequacy of the point kinetics method for analyzing rod-ejection accidents are presented. Two-group slab representations of three different seed-blanket reactors are considered. Five different point kinetics formulations are considered for each fictitious rod-ejection accident considered; each formulation being characterized by the shape functions used to calculate the instantaneous reactivity. From these numerical studies we conclude that the accuracy of a point model, for rapid, nonseparable transients of the type considered, is extremely dependent upon the specifics of the particular model (i.e., on the shape function used), and in general one cannot assume a priori that a specific point model is conservative or nonconservative.