ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
P. K. Doshi, George H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 39 | Number 2 | February 1970 | Pages 182-192
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A subcritical assembly (29 × 38 × 29 cm) built of TRIGA-type fuel elements was pulsed by coupling it with the Illinois TRIGA reactor through a graphite thermal column (2 ft square by 4 ft long). Flux measurements were made at seven locations in four different fuel loadings—9, 16, 25, and 49 fuel elements—with keff varying from ∼0.4 to 0.92. A polynomial expansion method is used to provide a continuous representation of pulse shapes. Derivatives appearing in a diffusion-theory model, evaluated using this expansion, are then used to determine the propagation velocity and the neutronic parameters. The maximum “asymptotic” velocity (removed from the boundaries) varied from ∼4 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.60 to 2.54 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.92. The theoretical model involves an expansion which, depending on the number of terms retained, bounds the experimental data. However, differences of as much as 40% in absolute values are observed and they are attributed to inadequacies in the model for this small heterogeneous assembly. Uncertainties in the neutronic parameters, as well as nonlinearities in the instrumentation, may also contribute.