ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
P. K. Doshi, George H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 39 | Number 2 | February 1970 | Pages 182-192
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A subcritical assembly (29 × 38 × 29 cm) built of TRIGA-type fuel elements was pulsed by coupling it with the Illinois TRIGA reactor through a graphite thermal column (2 ft square by 4 ft long). Flux measurements were made at seven locations in four different fuel loadings—9, 16, 25, and 49 fuel elements—with keff varying from ∼0.4 to 0.92. A polynomial expansion method is used to provide a continuous representation of pulse shapes. Derivatives appearing in a diffusion-theory model, evaluated using this expansion, are then used to determine the propagation velocity and the neutronic parameters. The maximum “asymptotic” velocity (removed from the boundaries) varied from ∼4 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.60 to 2.54 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.92. The theoretical model involves an expansion which, depending on the number of terms retained, bounds the experimental data. However, differences of as much as 40% in absolute values are observed and they are attributed to inadequacies in the model for this small heterogeneous assembly. Uncertainties in the neutronic parameters, as well as nonlinearities in the instrumentation, may also contribute.