ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Alan Staub, D. R. Harris, and Mark Goldsmith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 34 | Number 3 | December 1968 | Pages 263-274
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A21091
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A group of 11 aqueous critical experiments fueled by 233U and 235U and performed by Gwin and Magnuson have been analyzed to serve as integral tests of nuclear data important in reactor design. Measured eignvalues were corrected for various effects including the presence of the aluminum container, departures from sphericity, delayed-neutron importance, and room return. Eigenvalues were calculated in simplified P-3 approximation using 60 energy groups, and determinations were made of the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.1%) associated with this treatment. Within the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.25%) resulting from fuel inventories, it was concluded that fissile nuclide and H(n,γ) cross sections were adequate to match calculations and experiments but that there was evidence of erroneous nuclear data important in determining neutron leakage. In particular, a substantially harder 233U fission neutron spectrum seems to be indicated.