ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
W. L. Whittemore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 33 | Number 2 | August 1968 | Pages 195-208
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A20657
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Atomic Neutron Velocity Selector was used to study the details of neutron scattering in liquid D2O maintained at 300° K. The scattering into various angular directions between 30 and 120° is studied for incident neutrons with energies ranging up to ∼0.65 eV. The energy-transfer cross sections, corrected for plural scattering effects, are evaluated to provide data in regions of large energy and momentum transfers not previously available and not readily accessible to experimenters using a reactor as a source of neutrons. The present results agree satisfactorily with the previous results but indicate that the previous results contain effects due to plural scattering in the sample. The present results also are compared with theory. Although there are some regions of acceptable agreement, other regions of poorer agreement indicate that each of these theoretical treatments may need further attention.