ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
W. L. Whittemore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 33 | Number 2 | August 1968 | Pages 195-208
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A20657
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Atomic Neutron Velocity Selector was used to study the details of neutron scattering in liquid D2O maintained at 300° K. The scattering into various angular directions between 30 and 120° is studied for incident neutrons with energies ranging up to ∼0.65 eV. The energy-transfer cross sections, corrected for plural scattering effects, are evaluated to provide data in regions of large energy and momentum transfers not previously available and not readily accessible to experimenters using a reactor as a source of neutrons. The present results agree satisfactorily with the previous results but indicate that the previous results contain effects due to plural scattering in the sample. The present results also are compared with theory. Although there are some regions of acceptable agreement, other regions of poorer agreement indicate that each of these theoretical treatments may need further attention.