ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Amir N. Nahavandi, Richard F. Von Hollen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 4 | August 1965 | Pages 463-469
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical model for the prediction of steam-water critical-flow pressure, mass discharge and pressure gradients in the approach region to critical flow is presented. The continuity, momentum and energy equations are applied to successive differential elements along the conduit and are solved numerically on an IBM-7094 digital computer for the maximum discharge flow rate. The proposed model assumes thermal equilibrium conditions and employs the modified Armand correlation to relate the void fraction to steam quality. The frictional losses in the momentum equation are obtained by two methods: a separated flow model and Armand model. A comparison of the analytical predictions with available test results on small diameter pipes shows that: 1) the present model agrees with the published test data; and 2) both frictional loss models are equally valid, and the selection of a particular method depends on the degree of conservatism desired.