ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Amir N. Nahavandi, Richard F. Von Hollen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 4 | August 1965 | Pages 463-469
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical model for the prediction of steam-water critical-flow pressure, mass discharge and pressure gradients in the approach region to critical flow is presented. The continuity, momentum and energy equations are applied to successive differential elements along the conduit and are solved numerically on an IBM-7094 digital computer for the maximum discharge flow rate. The proposed model assumes thermal equilibrium conditions and employs the modified Armand correlation to relate the void fraction to steam quality. The frictional losses in the momentum equation are obtained by two methods: a separated flow model and Armand model. A comparison of the analytical predictions with available test results on small diameter pipes shows that: 1) the present model agrees with the published test data; and 2) both frictional loss models are equally valid, and the selection of a particular method depends on the degree of conservatism desired.