ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
Hiroshi Motoda
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 41 | Number 1 | July 1970 | Pages 1-13
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20357
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variational treatment of the burnup optimization of continuous scattered refueling is presented and numerical solutions are given for a slab reactor. It is made quantitatively clear how the reactor dimension, the xenon and the Doppler feedback reactivity, the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the reflector performance affect the power distribution that maximizes the average discharge exposure. Power flattening and burnup maximization are contradictory in general, but are consistent if, and only if, the condition of the perfect reflection at the core boundary is satisfied. The optimal power distribution is peaked in the central—and depleted in the outer region; and becomes flatter as the reflector performance is increased. The maximum average burnup depends on the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the strength of the Doppler and the xenon feedback reactivity, even if the average burnup calculated by the point-reactor model is the same. The former effect on the optimal power distribution is very small but the latter effects greatly contribute to power flattening. Both effects reduce the maximum burnup and the effects of the latter two are of comparable order. As the reactor becomes smaller, the maximum burnup decreases almost linearly to the neutron leakage. Optimal refueling has an advantage of more than 10% in the average burnup over the conventional flat-refueling rate method. However the difference from the flat-burnup method is very small, considering that the optimal refueling is handicapped by its very bad power distribution.