ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
Hiroshi Motoda
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 41 | Number 1 | July 1970 | Pages 1-13
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20357
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variational treatment of the burnup optimization of continuous scattered refueling is presented and numerical solutions are given for a slab reactor. It is made quantitatively clear how the reactor dimension, the xenon and the Doppler feedback reactivity, the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the reflector performance affect the power distribution that maximizes the average discharge exposure. Power flattening and burnup maximization are contradictory in general, but are consistent if, and only if, the condition of the perfect reflection at the core boundary is satisfied. The optimal power distribution is peaked in the central—and depleted in the outer region; and becomes flatter as the reflector performance is increased. The maximum average burnup depends on the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the strength of the Doppler and the xenon feedback reactivity, even if the average burnup calculated by the point-reactor model is the same. The former effect on the optimal power distribution is very small but the latter effects greatly contribute to power flattening. Both effects reduce the maximum burnup and the effects of the latter two are of comparable order. As the reactor becomes smaller, the maximum burnup decreases almost linearly to the neutron leakage. Optimal refueling has an advantage of more than 10% in the average burnup over the conventional flat-refueling rate method. However the difference from the flat-burnup method is very small, considering that the optimal refueling is handicapped by its very bad power distribution.