ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
K. S. Smith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 451-458
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An investigation of first-order perturbation (FOP) methods for computing sample worths has been performed. It is demonstrated that conventional cell homogenization methods introduce errors into FOP reactivity calculations because the intracell structure of adjoint fluxes is neglected. These errors are such that the conventional FOP reactivity expression is not accurate to first order, even in the limit of infinitesimal perturbations. A method for avoiding such approximations is introduced and applied to the calculation of small sample worths in plate-type fast reactor critical assemblies. It is demonstrated that errors introduced by real flux weighting of cross sections are such that homogenized FOP reactivity calculations overestimate fissile material worths in several critical assemblies by 5 to 10%. It is shown that these errors arise because of the heterogeneous nature of plate-type critical assemblies, and when appropriate reactivity calculations (which account for spatial heterogeneity of adjoint fluxes) are performed, a significant fraction of the long-standing central worth discrepancy is eliminated.