ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Powering the future: How the DOE is fueling nuclear fuel cycle research and development
As global interest in nuclear energy surges, the United States must remain at the forefront of research and development to ensure national energy security, advance nuclear technologies, and promote international cooperation on safety and nonproliferation. A crucial step in achieving this is analyzing how funding and resources are allocated to better understand how to direct future research and development. The Department of Energy has spearheaded this effort by funding hundreds of research projects across the country through the Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP). This initiative has empowered dozens of universities to collaborate toward a nuclear-friendly future.
W. E. Loewe, E. Mendelsohn
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 325-350
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20278
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We report the basis for new estimates of “free-in-air” kermas resulting from the nuclear explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for ground ranges out to 2 km. The results are substantially different from previously accepted values known as T65D, particularly for Hiroshima. The methodology used in our study is different from that of T65D. To obtain prompt neutron and gamma-ray kermas, calculated leakage spectra were utilized that had been generated by modern weapons design codes. These leakage spectra were used as sources in radiation transport calculations performed with extensively validated modern transport codes. We have further cross-checked our calculational results in one and two dimensions, and by using very different solution techniques. For delayed gamma rays, we used a formalism based on the results of atmospheric testing. Our results have been compared with Japanese in situ measurements of neutron activation and of gamma-ray kerma, and found to show good agreement with them. We have explained the major differences between the T65D values and our own, as well as between neutron kermas inferred from the in situ activations and our kerma values. These new results merit confidence. However, improvements in these estimates can occur when additional work is done. One application of practical importance to radiological protection standards has already been made.