ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
W. E. Loewe, E. Mendelsohn
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 325-350
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20278
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We report the basis for new estimates of “free-in-air” kermas resulting from the nuclear explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for ground ranges out to 2 km. The results are substantially different from previously accepted values known as T65D, particularly for Hiroshima. The methodology used in our study is different from that of T65D. To obtain prompt neutron and gamma-ray kermas, calculated leakage spectra were utilized that had been generated by modern weapons design codes. These leakage spectra were used as sources in radiation transport calculations performed with extensively validated modern transport codes. We have further cross-checked our calculational results in one and two dimensions, and by using very different solution techniques. For delayed gamma rays, we used a formalism based on the results of atmospheric testing. Our results have been compared with Japanese in situ measurements of neutron activation and of gamma-ray kerma, and found to show good agreement with them. We have explained the major differences between the T65D values and our own, as well as between neutron kermas inferred from the in situ activations and our kerma values. These new results merit confidence. However, improvements in these estimates can occur when additional work is done. One application of practical importance to radiological protection standards has already been made.