ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
July 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC’s David Wright visits the Hill and more NRC news
Wright
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the spotlight today for three very different reasons. First, NRC Chair David Wright was on Capitol Hill yesterday for his renomination hearing in front of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee. Second, the NRC released its updated milestone schedules according to the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA) and the executive orders signed by President Trump last month; and third, as reported by Reuters on Tuesday, 28 former NRC officials have condemned the dismissal of Commissioner Hanson earlier this month.
Renomination: EPW Committee chair Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R., W.Va.) opened the hearing with a statement praising Wright’s experience and emphasized the urgency of stable leadership at the NRC.
“China is executing a rapid build-out of its nuclear industry,” Capito said. “The demand for clean, baseload power is skyrocketing as we position America to win the AI race.”
M. Segev, G. Raitses, J. M. Paratte
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 131 | Number 1 | January 1999 | Pages 123-131
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE99-A2023
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The radial distribution of capture rate and effective cross section in fuel rods of radii R, forming a light water reactor (LWR) lattice, is derived with routine cell calculations. Any internal radial subrange (r1,r2) is treated through the assessment of absorption in the two corresponding annular absorbers (r1,R) and (r2,R). The lattice of the latter absorbers, whose pitch is exactly the original LWR lattice pitch, is equivalenced to a lattice of solid cylindrical rods. Thus, for example, to obtain a tenfold radial distribution, ten routine cell calculations are required.In determining the radius s of a cylinder equivalent to the annulus (r,R), the neutron escape from the annulus is first preserved by making the s rod have a circumference of 2R[1 - (0.5 - (1/)cos-1(r/R))G], where G is the "sticking" probability in the annulus for neutrons entering it from within. The radius s is then the result of making the solid rod and the annulus have the same average chord. In addition, a lattice is assigned to the s rods such that the original Dancoff factor is preserved. Finally, a Bell factor is determined for the s rod such that the actual grayness of the annulus (r,R) is preserved.A special program for transport-related probabilities is invoked in obtaining the sticking and Dancoff probabilities just described, as well as the Bell factor.Application of the theory was conducted with the ELCOS system BOXER cell code. Three benchmarks were considered. The first was the one suggested by Tellier et al. for a fuel pin of a typical pressurized water reactor cell. The second was almost identical to the first, except that the fuel was saturated with hydrogen to generate a flatter radial distribution than in the first benchmark. The third benchmark was based on detailed space-energy calculations for a boiling water reactor rod, performed in 1978.All three benchmark testings resulted in satisfactory comparisons. Hence, the present theory may provide a practical, routine way of obtaining the in-rod distribution of absorption and cross section, calling just for a repeated use of straightforward cell calculations.