ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
H. H. Hassan, G. H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 3 | June 1970 | Pages 449-459
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20196
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Space-time nuclear reactor kinetic calculations based on the well-known computer program WIGLE are compared with measurements from neutron-pulse-propagation experiments. Transients were induced in a heavy-water-moderated, natural uranium subcritical assembly using a coupling extending through a graphite thermal column to a pulsed TRIGA reactor. Results are reported for five keff values ranging from 0 to 0.92, involving cases both with and without cadmium control rods inserted. A unit-cell-homogenization technique was adopted for analysis purposes, with special attention being given to proper parameter assignment, such as neutron velocity averaging. Calculation results compare favorably with experimental results for the interior of the assembly; however, differences as large as 7% are noted near interfaces or boundaries.