ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
R. A. Karam, K. D. Dance, T. Nakamura, J. E. Marshall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 3 | June 1970 | Pages 414-423
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An integral transport method was developed and applied to the calculation of the central reactivity worths of various samples measured in a 2700-liter uranium-carbide fast core and in a 4000-liter UO2 fast core. The method was used to obtain corrections to multigroup first-order perturbation calculations, incorporating self-shielding effects inside and outside the sample, as well as scattering, fission, and edge-effect perturbations. Resonance interaction between a 238U sample and the 238U in the core as well as resonance self-shielding in the sample itself were explicitly considered. A similar treatment was used for 235U samples. ENDF/B data were used in all of the analyses. The calculated central worths of 10B and tantalum were in very good agreement with the measured values, indicating that the calculated value of βeff used to convert percent Δk/k to period measurements was reasonably accurate. The calculated worths of 235U were 5 to 10% greater than the measured values. The discrepancy between the calculated and measured values for 238U was 15 to 20%. The discrepancy for graphite in particular and scatterers in general was rather large, indicating that the distribution of the adjoint function is not adequately calculated.