ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
R. A. Karam, K. D. Dance, T. Nakamura, J. E. Marshall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 3 | June 1970 | Pages 414-423
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An integral transport method was developed and applied to the calculation of the central reactivity worths of various samples measured in a 2700-liter uranium-carbide fast core and in a 4000-liter UO2 fast core. The method was used to obtain corrections to multigroup first-order perturbation calculations, incorporating self-shielding effects inside and outside the sample, as well as scattering, fission, and edge-effect perturbations. Resonance interaction between a 238U sample and the 238U in the core as well as resonance self-shielding in the sample itself were explicitly considered. A similar treatment was used for 235U samples. ENDF/B data were used in all of the analyses. The calculated central worths of 10B and tantalum were in very good agreement with the measured values, indicating that the calculated value of βeff used to convert percent Δk/k to period measurements was reasonably accurate. The calculated worths of 235U were 5 to 10% greater than the measured values. The discrepancy between the calculated and measured values for 238U was 15 to 20%. The discrepancy for graphite in particular and scatterers in general was rather large, indicating that the distribution of the adjoint function is not adequately calculated.