ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Countering the nuclear workforce shortage narrative
James Chamberlain, director of the Nuclear, Utilities, and Energy Sector at Rullion, has declared that the nuclear industry will not have workforce challenges going forward. “It’s time to challenge the scarcity narrative,” he wrote in a recent online article. “Nuclear isn't short of talent; it’s short of imagination in how it attracts, trains, and supports the workforce of the future.”
W. S. Winters, Jr., H. Merte, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 69 | Number 3 | March 1979 | Pages 411-429
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE79-A19959
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Phase equilibrium blowdown models are not valid for geometries having small characteristic lengths (volume-to-break-area ratios). For such geometries, the two-phase expansion is too rapid to permit adequate heat and mass transfer between liquid and vapor to maintain phase equilibrium. The two-phase expansions observed during the present pipe blowdown experiments with dichlorodifluoromethane (R-12) were found to exhibit pronounced nonequilibrium behavior. Decompression transients were characterized by a rapid drop in pressure from the initial value to levels well below the initial saturation pressure. The pressure recovery caused by delayed growth of the vapor in superheated liquid leveled off to pressure plateaus well below the initial saturation pressure. Long-term blowdown transients were not affected by the initial pressure level, but initial temperature and pipe geometry were observed to have a pronounced influence. Higher initial temperatures resulted in higher pressure plateaus and shorter blowdown times. The rapid phase expansions occurring in pipe geometries having small volume-to-break-area ratios resulted in greater departures from phase equilibrium, as evidenced by the lower pressure plateaus observed experimentally. Transient temperature measurements indicated substantial temperature differences between liquid and vapor during blowdown. Furthermore, the vapor was observed to be saturated with respect to the system pressure for most of the blowdown event. To describe this experimentally observed nonequilibrium behavior, a model was formulated that treats the expanding two-phase fluid as a pseudo-homogeneous mixture of uniformly distributed, heat transfer dominated, spherical vapor bubbles surrounded by superheated liquid. By adjusting two empirical parameters—discharge coefficient, Cd, and bubble density, N—to permit the model to simulate R-12 blowdown from one particular blowdown geometry and set of initial conditions, it was possible to use the model in predicting R-12 blowdown transients for other geometries and initial conditions as well as for pipe water blowdown. The nonequilibrium model predictions were considerably more accurate than those of the phase equilibrium model, although consistent discrepancies were observed in all model-data comparisons. It is believed that two-dimensional effects near the pipe exit, liquid inertia influences on bubble growth, and limitations in the choked flow model are primarily responsible for the discrepancies.