ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
J. E. Bodine, I. J. Groce, J. Guon, L. A. Hanson
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 19 | Number 1 | May 1964 | Pages 1-7
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A19784
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The oxidative decladding of UO2 fuels has been demonstrated on three-foot sections of unirradiated fuel rods and on eight-inch sections of fuel rods irradiated to 21,000 MWd/MTU. Decladding rates were unaffected by the extent of irradiation. Uranium dioxide which was unirradiated, irradiated, and with fissia added to simulate 100,000 MWd/MTU irradiation was declad at similar rates. The effect of pressure and temperature on decladding rates was determined. Puncturing the cladding greatly enhanced the rate and gave a coarser product. This product was not completely converted to U3O8 during oxidative decladding. Greater than 99.9% of the UO2 fuel was removed from the cladding. There was no detectable contamination of the product by the cladding material. Little or no fission-product or plutonium decontamination was observed. Dissolution rates for the declad product, in 50% nitric acid, were 20 times as fast as for the “as received” UO2 fuel.