ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Harry J. Reilly, John D. Hansell, George L. Heath
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 38 | Number 2 | November 1969 | Pages 135-142
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE69-A19518
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method of performing probability calculations for nuclear-reactor surface temperatures has been devised. The method gives consideration to the fact that some uncertainties may vary systematically over all the reactor or over some parts of it. The method does not depend on assumption of any particular form of the probability distributions. The method was used to do an example calculation for an MTR-type test reactor with plate-type fuel elements. It was shown that the calculated probability of failure, that is, that surface temperature exceeds coolant saturation temperature, lies closer to values obtained from the Deterministic Method than to values from the Statistical Method. The calculated probability value was identified as the probability of success at the instant of reactor startup. It was observed that the probability of success for continued operation might not be the same as the value for startup. The method gives an improved representation of the probability problem for reactor surface temperatures. However, there is still much to be learned about the various important distribution functions. In the present situation of inadequate knowledge of behavior and distributions of uncertainty factors, all such probability calculations must be regarded as providing only a rough approximation to the true probability of success for a reactor.