ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Remembering Joseph M. Hendrie
Joseph M. Hendrie
To those of us who knew Joe, even prior to his appointment as chair of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, it is an understatement to say that he was a larger-than-life member of the nuclear science and technology enterprise. He was best known to the broader community for two major accomplishments: the design and construction of the High Flux Beam Reactor (HFBR) at Brookhaven National Laboratory and the creation of the standard review plan (SRP) for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
In addition to the products of these endeavors becoming major fundaments to their respective communities, they were uniquely Joe. The safety analysis report for the HFBR was written essentially single-handedly by him. This was true of the SRP as well, which became the key safety review document for the NRC as it performed safety reviews for the growing number of power reactor applications in the United States. His deep technical knowledge of nuclear engineering and his extraordinary management skills made this possible.
Doan L. Phung
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 90 | Number 4 | August 1985 | Pages 509-520
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE85-A18501
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Light water reactor safety in the United States through the Three Mile Island (TMI) accident is reviewed and safety gains up to 1983 are assessed. The work was undertaken during 1982–1983 to support Alvin Weinberg's “Second Nuclear Era Study.” Safety studies, such as the “Rasmussen Reactor Safety Study,” and accidents, such as TMI, disclosed deficiencies in the design basis accident technique and the lack of attention to human factors, including management. Operational problems also highlighted the fact that reactors grew too quickly in size and number for experience to be factored into designs, operating procedures, and regulations. Actions taken by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and by the industry following TMI are reviewed. Analytical and experimental programs on severe accidents are examined. Safety gains resulting from these activities and from improved quality of operation are assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. It was determined that a factor of 3 to 6 for core melt frequencies and of at least 10 for public risk have been achieved since TMI.