ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
W. L. Whittemore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 18 | Number 2 | February 1964 | Pages 182-188
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A18317
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Atomic neutron-velocity selector has been used at the electron linear accelerator to study the inelastic scattering by liquid methane and liquid parahydrogen of monoenergetic neutrons with incident energies in the range 0.009 to 0.17 eV. The energy dependence of the total cross sections and the neutron spectra produced by specimens of these materials have also been measured. The inelastic scattering of slow neutrons (< 0.010 eV) at 90° by liquid parahydrogen appears to be smaller than expected on the basis of the measured total cross section and the angular dependence calculated by Sarma. Perhaps this is related to the fact that the total cross section is larger than for freely rotating molecules, indicating the possible existence of some hindrance to molecular motion. The slowing-down power, σnE0/E, a quantitative measure of the neutron-moderating ability, is evaluated from the measured inelastic neutron-scattering data and compared for various neutron energies for the two liquids. A consideration of the various data leads to the conclusion (1) that solid methane is better than liquid parahydrogen for production of very “cold” neutrons (E0 < 0.007 eV), and (2) that parahydrogen is superior to liquid methane for production of cold neutrons with E0 < 0.005 eV.