ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
R. L. French, J. H. Price, and K. W. Tompkins
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 27 | Number 2 | February 1967 | Pages 360-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A18275
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Four simple enclosure shields were exposed to fallout from Shot Small Boy of Operation Sunbeam. Gamma-ray measurements were made both inside and outside the enclosures to determine time-dependent and time-integrated dose transmission factors (dose inside divided by dose outside). The analysis of the experiment consisted of calculating similar factors and comparing with the measured data. Monte Carlo procedures were used to determine the radiation distribution incident upon the shields and to compute the radiation penetration into the shields. Fallout gamma-ray spectra resulting from several different theoretical and experimental investigations were used in calculating the dose transmission factors. The calculated dose transmission factors were found to be consistently higher than the measured factors by as much as a factor of 2, depending upon the particular source term. After investigating several possible causes, it was concluded that the discrepancy was probably the cumulative effect of a deficiency of low-energy photons in the calculated source terms, omission of support structure inside the enclosure shields in the penetration calculations, and of neglecting the effects of ground roughness in the calculations.