ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
D. R. Mathews, K. F. Hansen, and E. A. Mason
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 27 | Number 2 | February 1967 | Pages 263-270
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A18266
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The method of invariant imbedding has been applied to neutron shielding problems in plane geometry with realistic energy and angle-dependent cross sections. The method seems to offer advantages over competing methods when the shield is heterogeneous and very thick or when the shield is composed of a very large number of different regions. Reflection and transmission equations are derived by the method of invariant imbedding and their numerical solution discussed. A simple exponential approximation is shown to work well for the solution of these equations. Results for several problems including a thick homogenous water shield and a thinner heterogeneous iron/polyethylene/iron shield are compared with results obtained by other methods.