ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
R. G. Nisle, I. E. Stepan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 31 | Number 2 | February 1968 | Pages 241-246
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A18236
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The yields of 135I in the fission of 233U, 239Pu, and 241pu relative to that of 235U have been measured by an integral method using the Advanced Reactivity Measurement Facilities (ARMF I and II). The xenon reactivity transient was measured following irradiation of the fissile isotope in the Materials Testing Reactor (MTR) for periods from to 2½ to 16 days. The use of the two ARMF reactors permits the calculation of the absorption cross sections of both simple absorbers and fissile atoms. The 135I yield ratios, relative to 235U, were found to be 0.825 ± 0.072 for 233U, 1.006 ± 0.067 for 239Pu, and 1.221 ± 0.089 for 241Pu. The uncertainties quoted are confidence intervals at the 90% confidence level.