ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
H. L. Brown, Jr., T. J. Connolly
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 6-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18119
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for calculating effective cadmium cutoff energies to be applied to measured resonance integrals of Doppler-broadened-resonance absorbers, as well as l/υ absorbers, is described. The method is applied to infinite slab, infinite cylinder, and sphere configurations in which the absorber, at some uniform concentration, occupies all the space within the cadmium cover. It is pointed out that the effective cutoff value applying to an activation measurement of a resonance integral differs from that applying to a reactivity measurement under otherwise identical conditions. The development of calculations for both cases is presented. Some results are given for gold, indium-115, plutonium-240, and the l/υ absorbers, boron and vanadium, as a function of sample configuration, cadmium thickness, absorber density, temperature, and neutron spectrum. Many of these values differ significantly from the nominal 0.5 eV.