ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
F. Käppeler, K. Wisshak, L. D. Hong
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 84 | Number 3 | July 1983 | Pages 234-247
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A17792
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron capture cross sections of 56Fe and 58Fe have been measured in the energy range from 10 to 250 keV relative to the gold standard. A pulsed 3-MV Van de Graaff accelerator and the 7Li(p,n) reaction served as a neutron source. Capture gamma rays were detected by two C6D6 detectors, which were operated in coincidence and anticoincidence modes. Two-dimensional data acquisition allowed the offline application of the pulse height weighting technique. The samples were located at a 60-cm flight path. The total time resolution was 1.2 ns allowing an energy resolution of 2 ns/m. The experimental setup was optimized with respect to low background and low neutron sensitivity. The additional 4-cm flight path from the sample to the detector was sufficient to discriminate against the capture of sample scattered neutrons by the additional time of flight. In this way reliable results were obtained even for the strong s-wave resonances of both isotopes. The experimental capture yield was analyzed with the FANAC code. The energy resolution allowed extraction of resonance parameters in the energy range from 10 to 100 keV. Individual systematic uncertainties were found to range between 5 and 10% while the statistical uncertainty is 3 to 5% for most resonances. A comparison to other results exhibits systematic differences of 7 to 11% for 56Fe. The present results for 58Fe differ up to 50% from the only other measurement for this isotope.