ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
R. E. Wilson, C. Barnes, Jr., R. Koonz, L. Baker, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 25 | Number 2 | June 1966 | Pages 109-115
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A17727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Isothermal studies of the kinetics of the reaction of metallic uranium with steam by a volumetric method are reported. The reaction U + 2H2O → UO2 + 2H2, ∆H = -142 kcal/mole at 1133°C, could be described accurately by the following parabolic rate law between 600 and 1200°C: V2 = (1.95±0.8)× 105 t[exp(-18 600±750)/ RT], where V is the volume of H2 evolved in milliliters at STP per square centimeter, t is the time in minutes, R is the gas constant, 1.987 cal/(mole deg K), and T is the absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin. Between 1200 and 1600°C the following parabolic rate law described the experimental results: V2 = (1.59± 0.5) × 106 t[exp(-25 000 ± 1000)/RT], although it was likely that an activation energy somewhat greater than 25 kcal/mole should be used for extrapolation to short reaction times or higher reaction temperatures. The reaction at 400°C followed a linear rate, while at 500°C the reaction was complicated by effects of the transition from a linear reaction at low temperatures to a parabolic reaction at higher temperatures. The oxide formed at 600°C and above was a glossy black UO2 which did not flake off until the samples were cooled after exposure. Oxide formed at 400°C was a brown colloidal material that was continually washed from the sample.