ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
R. E. Wilson, C. Barnes, Jr., R. Koonz, L. Baker, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 25 | Number 2 | June 1966 | Pages 109-115
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A17727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Isothermal studies of the kinetics of the reaction of metallic uranium with steam by a volumetric method are reported. The reaction U + 2H2O → UO2 + 2H2, ∆H = -142 kcal/mole at 1133°C, could be described accurately by the following parabolic rate law between 600 and 1200°C: V2 = (1.95±0.8)× 105 t[exp(-18 600±750)/ RT], where V is the volume of H2 evolved in milliliters at STP per square centimeter, t is the time in minutes, R is the gas constant, 1.987 cal/(mole deg K), and T is the absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin. Between 1200 and 1600°C the following parabolic rate law described the experimental results: V2 = (1.59± 0.5) × 106 t[exp(-25 000 ± 1000)/RT], although it was likely that an activation energy somewhat greater than 25 kcal/mole should be used for extrapolation to short reaction times or higher reaction temperatures. The reaction at 400°C followed a linear rate, while at 500°C the reaction was complicated by effects of the transition from a linear reaction at low temperatures to a parabolic reaction at higher temperatures. The oxide formed at 600°C and above was a glossy black UO2 which did not flake off until the samples were cooled after exposure. Oxide formed at 400°C was a brown colloidal material that was continually washed from the sample.