ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
P. F. Nichols
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 17 | Number 1 | September 1963 | Pages 144-148
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A17219
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Reactivity measurements have been made in the Physical Constants Testing Reactor (PCTR) on a series of plutonium-aluminum rods with 0.65 in. diam and 31.00 in. long. The samples were contained in a cadmium cover during the measurements. The series of rods consisted of eight sets of two rods each. Two separate batches of plutonium with different isotopic compositions were used in the two rods within a set. The concentrations of plutonium in the alloys were adjusted in such a manner that (1) the two rods within a set differed effectively only in Pu240 content, and (2) the rod with the most Pu240 in one set had the same quantity of Pu240 as the rod with the least Pu240 in an adjacent set. The difference in reactivity measured between the rods in a set is the result of different resonance absorption rates in Pu240 in the two rods. The sensitivity of the reactor to epicadmium absorption in Pu240 was obtained by calibrating the system with three sets of rods that were all very nearly dilute in Pu240 concentration. The experimental data yield effective resonance integrals of Pu240 for the remaining rods relative to the dilute resonance integral. The value of the effective resonance integral for the rod with the highest concentration of Pu240 is a factor of about seven smaller than the dilute integral.