ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS 2023)
May 7–11, 2023
Idaho Falls, ID|Snake River Event Center
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2023
Jan 2023
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2023
Nuclear Technology
April 2023
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2023
Latest News
Donalds, Barnard call for streamlining NRC’s regulatory process
Barnard
Donalds
“To be frank, any emissions-related climate goals are moonshots without nuclear energy, and next-generation nuclear technology is something that the United States can and SHOULD lead on.” So writes U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds (R., Fla.) and Christopher Barnard, vice president of external affairs for the American Conservation Coalition, in an essay published by RealClear Energy.
Good news: Donalds, one of the strongest advocates for nuclear energy in the U.S. House, and Barnard, publisher and coauthor of Green Market Revolution, begin their essay by noting some recent positive developments for nuclear power. They characterize the initial criticality of Vogtle-3, the first new nuclear reactor built in the United States in about 30 years, as “a monumental achievement for the American nuclear industry.” They praise the Biden administration’s allocation of funds to keep established nuclear plants operational.
Emily R. Wolters, Edward W. Larsen, William R. Martin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 174 | Number 3 | July 2013 | Pages 286-299
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-72
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this paper, two modifications to improve the efficiency of Lee et al.'s recently proposed “CMFD [coarse-mesh finite difference]-accelerated Monte Carlo” method for neutron criticality problems are presented and tested. This CMFD method employs standard Monte Carlo techniques to estimate nonlinear functionals (ratios of integrals), which are used in low-order CMFD equations to obtain the eigenvalue and discrete representations of the eigenfunction. In a “feedback” procedure, the Monte Carlo fission source is then modified to match the resulting CMFD fission source. The proposed new methods differ from the CMFD-accelerated Monte Carlo method only in the definition of the nonlinear functionals. The new methods are compared with the CMFD-accelerated Monte Carlo method for two high-dominance-ratio test problems. All of the hybrid methods rapidly converge the Monte Carlo fission source, enabling a large reduction in the number of inactive cycles. However, the new methods stabilize the fission source more efficiently than the CMFD-accelerated Monte Carlo method, enabling a reduction in the number of active cycles as well. Also, in all the hybrid methods, the apparent variance of the eigenfunction is nearly equal to the real variance, so the real statistical error is well estimated from a single calculation. This is a major advantage over the standard Monte Carlo method, in which the real variance is typically underestimated due to intercycle correlations.