ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Ian Wall—ANS member since 1964
Ian Wall early in his career . . .
I graduated with a degree in mechanical engineering from Imperial College, London, in 1958. Nuclear power was viewed favorably at the time, so I took a 1-year course on the subject. I was then offered fellowships at Cambridge University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and thought the latter would be more interesting, so I moved to Cambridge, Mass., to study nuclear engineering. After completing my doctorate in 1964, I joined the American Nuclear Society and took a job with General Electric, then in San Jose, Calif.
In 1967, GE assigned me to explore the use of probability in reactor safety. At that time, the prevailing opinion was that the probability of a severe accident was infinitesimally small and the consequences would be catastrophic.
D. P. Barry, G. Leinweber, R. C. Block, T. J. Donovan, Y. Danon, F. J. Saglime, A. M. Daskalakis, M. J. Rapp, R. M. Bahran
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 174 | Number 2 | June 2013 | Pages 188-201
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-1
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
High-energy-neutron-scattering experiments for elemental zirconium were performed at the electron linear accelerator facility at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. The scattering experiments were performed in the energy region from 0.5 to 20 MeV using the time-of-flight technique. The scattering system is composed of an array of eight EJ301 liquid scintillator detectors coupled to photomultiplier tubes. The detector array collects data simultaneously at various angles. The raw signals from each detector were digitized and transferred to a personal computer hard drive for storage. The digitized data were postprocessed, and pulse-shape analysis was performed to determine whether the pulse was the result of a gamma ray or a neutron being detected. The experimental results were compared with Monte Carlo transport calculations that simulated the experiment. This comparison was a way to benchmark several nuclear data libraries used in the Monte Carlo code. Ratios of the calculated data to the experimental data (C/E values) are presented and used to compare the nuclear data libraries. Results show that the experimentally observed scattering cross section is smaller than the one used in the evaluated libraries at energies between 10 and 20 MeV. For all energies and angles, the investigated nuclear data libraries agree with the experimental data to within 9%. Overall, the JEFF-3.1 and JENDL-4.0 libraries provide the best match to the experimental data.