ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Kohtaro Ueki, Yoshihito Namito
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 96 | Number 1 | May 1987 | Pages 30-38
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-A16361
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Integral shielding experiments using iron-polyethylene slab shields were carried out to determine an optimum arrangement for the neutron dose rate. The total thickness of the iron slabs was fixed at 32 cm, while several thicknesses of polyethylene slabs were employed as a parameter. Some measured data were analyzed by the Monte Carlo code MORSE-CG with the splitting technique. Depending on the location of the polyethylene slab, the measured neutron dose rates changed remarkably in the iron-polyethylene shielding system. When the polyethylene slab was 1 cm thick, the ratio of the maximum neutron dose rate to the minimum value was 1.3, and the ratio was increased to as much as 5.4 for the 14-cm-thick polyethylene slab. The minimum dose point (i.e., optimum shielding arrangement) was observed when the polyethylene slab was located near the detector with the iron slab placed near the neutron source. This was also demonstrated by the Monte Carlo calculations.