ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New consortium to address industry need for nuclear heat and power
Hoping to tackle a growing global demand for energy, The Open Group, a vendor-neutral technology and standards membership organization, has announced the formation of the Industrial Advanced Nuclear Consortium (IANC) to collaborate on finding advanced nuclear energy solutions to serve industrial customers.
V. Drüke, D. Filges, N. Kirch, R. D. Neef
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 57 | Number 4 | August 1975 | Pages 328-332
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A15424
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments in a subcritical assembly with pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor fuel and hydrogen ranging between 0 and 14.4 vol% were carried out to study the effects of water ingress on reactivity and to test the accuracy of diffusion-code calculations for small subcritical systems. Special emphasis is given to an adequate description of the influence of the water ingress on the diffusion properties of the pebble-bed system. The agreement between experimental and theoretical results is in all cases better than ±0.01 in keff.