ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Peter M. Song, Mahmoud Z. Youssef, Mohamed A. Abdou
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 113 | Number 4 | April 1993 | Pages 339-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A15333
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new approach for treating the sensitivity and uncertainty in the secondary energy distribution (SED) and the secondary angular distribution (SAD) has been developed, and the existing two-dimensional sensitivity/uncertainty analysis code, FORSS, was expanded to incorporate the new approach. The calculational algorithm was applied to the 9Be(n,2n) cross section to study the effect of the current uncertainties in the SED and SAD of neutrons emitted from this reaction on the prediction accuracy of the tritium production rate from 6Li (T6) and 7Li (T7) in an engineering-oriented fusion integral experiment of the U.S. Department of Energy/Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Collaborative Program on Fusion Neutronics in which beryllium was used as a neutron multiplier. In addition, the analysis was extended to include the uncertainties in the integrated smooth cross sections of beryllium and other materials that constituted the test assembly used in the experiment. This comprehensive two-dimensional cross-section sensitivity/uncertainty analysis aimed at identifying the sources of discrepancies between calculated and measured values for T6 and T7. Without considering the uncertainties in the SED and SAD of the 9Be(n,2n) cross section, the uncertainties in T6 are ∼2 to 3% in the Li2O breeding zone, whereas they are ∼10% when the uncertainties in the SED and SAD are included. The contribution from the uncertainties in the SAD was small (∼1%) compared with the contribution from the uncertainties in the SED. As for T7, the uncertainties in the Li2O zone with and without considering the SED and SAD results are 4 to 7 and 2 to 5.5%, respectively. The estimated uncertainties in T6 and T7 could partly cover the observed discrepancies between calculations and measurements, although other sources have been identified. Although the approach followed to complete the uncertainty analysis is not standard because of the absence of an existing file that contains the uncertainty information in the SED and SAD of the 9Be(n,2n) reaction, the results obtained by introducing approximations to these data clearly demonstrate the importance of accounting for the uncertainties in the SED and SAD when a complete cross-section sensitivity/uncertainty analysis is to be performed.