ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
BREAKING NEWS: Trump issues executive orders to overhaul nuclear industry
The Trump administration issued four executive orders today aimed at boosting domestic nuclear deployment ahead of significant growth in projected energy demand in the coming decades.
During a live signing in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump called nuclear “a hot industry,” adding, “It’s a brilliant industry. [But] you’ve got to do it right. It’s become very safe and environmental.”
Peter M. Song, Mahmoud Z. Youssef, Mohamed A. Abdou
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 113 | Number 4 | April 1993 | Pages 339-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A15333
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new approach for treating the sensitivity and uncertainty in the secondary energy distribution (SED) and the secondary angular distribution (SAD) has been developed, and the existing two-dimensional sensitivity/uncertainty analysis code, FORSS, was expanded to incorporate the new approach. The calculational algorithm was applied to the 9Be(n,2n) cross section to study the effect of the current uncertainties in the SED and SAD of neutrons emitted from this reaction on the prediction accuracy of the tritium production rate from 6Li (T6) and 7Li (T7) in an engineering-oriented fusion integral experiment of the U.S. Department of Energy/Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Collaborative Program on Fusion Neutronics in which beryllium was used as a neutron multiplier. In addition, the analysis was extended to include the uncertainties in the integrated smooth cross sections of beryllium and other materials that constituted the test assembly used in the experiment. This comprehensive two-dimensional cross-section sensitivity/uncertainty analysis aimed at identifying the sources of discrepancies between calculated and measured values for T6 and T7. Without considering the uncertainties in the SED and SAD of the 9Be(n,2n) cross section, the uncertainties in T6 are ∼2 to 3% in the Li2O breeding zone, whereas they are ∼10% when the uncertainties in the SED and SAD are included. The contribution from the uncertainties in the SAD was small (∼1%) compared with the contribution from the uncertainties in the SED. As for T7, the uncertainties in the Li2O zone with and without considering the SED and SAD results are 4 to 7 and 2 to 5.5%, respectively. The estimated uncertainties in T6 and T7 could partly cover the observed discrepancies between calculations and measurements, although other sources have been identified. Although the approach followed to complete the uncertainty analysis is not standard because of the absence of an existing file that contains the uncertainty information in the SED and SAD of the 9Be(n,2n) reaction, the results obtained by introducing approximations to these data clearly demonstrate the importance of accounting for the uncertainties in the SED and SAD when a complete cross-section sensitivity/uncertainty analysis is to be performed.