ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuo Azekura, Tadahiro Ohnishi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 4 | April 1977 | Pages 709-715
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A15211
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An improved response matrix method has been proposed to effectively take into account the anisotropy of neutron angular distributions. The method utilizes a relation between the P0 and P1 components of a neutron angular distribution instead of calculating them independently. Hence the number of unknowns as well as computing time can be kept about the same as in the conventional response matrix method which adopts an isotropic approximation of a neutron angular distribution. The proposed method has been evaluated by applying it to one-dimensional slab and two-dimensional hexagonal systems. The results are quite promising: In comparison with the reference SN calculation, the difference of the neutron multiplication factor and power distribution is within 0.1% Δk/k and 2%, respectively, and furthermore, the computing time is reduced to below one-third.