ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuo Azekura, Tadahiro Ohnishi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 4 | April 1977 | Pages 709-715
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A15211
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An improved response matrix method has been proposed to effectively take into account the anisotropy of neutron angular distributions. The method utilizes a relation between the P0 and P1 components of a neutron angular distribution instead of calculating them independently. Hence the number of unknowns as well as computing time can be kept about the same as in the conventional response matrix method which adopts an isotropic approximation of a neutron angular distribution. The proposed method has been evaluated by applying it to one-dimensional slab and two-dimensional hexagonal systems. The results are quite promising: In comparison with the reference SN calculation, the difference of the neutron multiplication factor and power distribution is within 0.1% Δk/k and 2%, respectively, and furthermore, the computing time is reduced to below one-third.