ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
J. T. Mihalczo, V. K. Paré, G. L. Ragan, M. V. Mathis, G. C. Tillett
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 66 | Number 1 | April 1978 | Pages 29-59
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A15186
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The theory of a method of determination of reactivity from power spectral density measurements with 252Cf and the results of experiments with a critical assembly mockup of a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) and with uranium (93.2 wt% 235U) metal cylinders and a sphere are presented. This method of reactivity determination has an advantage over existing methods in that it determines the reactivity only from properties of the reactor at the subcritical state of interest and thus does not require a calibration near delayed criticality. In these experiments, the reactivity was varied by changing the fissile loading or the amount of neutron absorber inserted; for the LMFBR mockup, the reactivity varied to ∼75 dollars subcritical, and for the uranium metal assemblies to ∼30 dollars subcritical. These experiments verified for the first time the predictions of theory that could be tested in the measurements. This method has potential use in the fuel loading of reactors to determine the reactivity far subcritical before initial criticality is achieved. It has the advantage of not requiring a calibration at known reactivity by another method; furthermore, the interpretation of the measured data to obtain the reactivity does not depend on relative or absolute values of the source intensity or detection efficiency. It can also be used to determine the reactivity of assemblies where loading to criticality is undesirable or where sufficient material to achieve criticality is not available.