ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
J. T. Mihalczo, V. K. Paré, G. L. Ragan, M. V. Mathis, G. C. Tillett
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 66 | Number 1 | April 1978 | Pages 29-59
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A15186
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The theory of a method of determination of reactivity from power spectral density measurements with 252Cf and the results of experiments with a critical assembly mockup of a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) and with uranium (93.2 wt% 235U) metal cylinders and a sphere are presented. This method of reactivity determination has an advantage over existing methods in that it determines the reactivity only from properties of the reactor at the subcritical state of interest and thus does not require a calibration near delayed criticality. In these experiments, the reactivity was varied by changing the fissile loading or the amount of neutron absorber inserted; for the LMFBR mockup, the reactivity varied to ∼75 dollars subcritical, and for the uranium metal assemblies to ∼30 dollars subcritical. These experiments verified for the first time the predictions of theory that could be tested in the measurements. This method has potential use in the fuel loading of reactors to determine the reactivity far subcritical before initial criticality is achieved. It has the advantage of not requiring a calibration at known reactivity by another method; furthermore, the interpretation of the measured data to obtain the reactivity does not depend on relative or absolute values of the source intensity or detection efficiency. It can also be used to determine the reactivity of assemblies where loading to criticality is undesirable or where sufficient material to achieve criticality is not available.