ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
EPA issues final rule regulating “forever chemicals”
The Environmental Protection Agency announced that it will issue a rule aimed at limiting public exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The final rule will designate two widely used PFAS chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund.
According to the EPA, both PFOA and PFOS meet the statutory criteria for designation as hazardous substances.
Megha Bhike, B. J. Roy, A. Saxena, R. K. Choudhury, S. Ganesan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 170 | Number 1 | January 2012 | Pages 44-53
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE10-63
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron-induced reaction cross sections for the reaction 232Th(n, )233Th have been measured at neutron energies of 1.6 ± 0.03 MeV, 2.2 ± 0.03 MeV, 3.0 ± 0.03 MeV, and 3.7 ± 0.03 MeV. We have also measured cross sections for the reactions 98Mo(n, )99Mo, 186W(n, )187W, 115In(n, )116m1In, and 92Mo(n, p)92mNb at a neutron energy of 3.2 ± 0.03 MeV. The 7Li(p, n)7Be reaction was used as the neutron source with the proton beam from the 14-MV Pelletron accelerator, Mumbai, and the standard off-line gamma counting method was followed for activation measurement. The present measurements supplement the existing data and provide new data in the neutron energy range where no results are available. While the cross-section values for the 98Mo(n, )99Mo and 186W(n, )187W reactions are reported for the first time, the data for 92Mo(n, p)92mNb exists with a large discrepancy between the two available data sets. For the 115In(n, )116m1In reaction, our measurement at 3.2 MeV is an additional data point where there exists significant disagreement among the data measured by different groups. The measurements are performed relative to the 115In(n, n′)115mIn and 197 Au(n, )198 Au cross sections of International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002. Detailed theoretical calculations using the statistical model code EMPIRE-II (latest version EMPIRE-2.19) have been performed. Good agreement with the present data along with the existing data set has been obtained by suitable adjustment of the level density parameter for all the systems. The experimental and theoretical results have been compared with the recent evaluations of ENDF/B-VII.0, JENDL-4.0, and JEFF-3.1.