ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
C. Vaglio-Gaudard, A. Santamarina, P. Blaise, O. Litaize, A. Lyoussi, G. Noguère, J. M. Ruggieri, J. F. Vidal
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 166 | Number 2 | October 2010 | Pages 89-106
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-91
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Programme d'Etude du Réflecteur Lourd dans Eole (PERLE) critical experiment was recently performed in the EOLE zero-power reactor to provide representative experimental data for heavy stainless steel (SS) reflector physics. It is a UO2 regular 27 × 27 square core surrounded by a 22-cm-thick SS block. The neutron source presents the same spectrum as Gen-III pressurized water reactors (PWRs).The analysis of measurements with the TRIPOLI4 reference Monte Carlo calculations notably aims at validating 56Fe nuclear data in the JEFF3.1.1 library. Large uncertainties are still associated with 56Fe nuclear data, in particular for the inelastic cross section ([approximate]10% at 1) since considerable discrepancies have been observed between various international evaluations of the inelastic level.This paper is dedicated to the analysis of the PERLE experiment. The reactivity worth of the PERLE heavy reflector was measured and compared with the efficiency of both the water reflector and the standard PWR reflector (2-cm-SS baffle). The radial power distribution at the core/reflector interface was measured by direct gamma spectrometry on fuel pins. The TRIPOLI4 analysis gives satisfactory results. The flux attenuation with SS penetration was measured by miniature fission chambers and metallic activation foils, using the fast, intermediate, and thermal response function. Interpretation of flux attenuation measurements shows calculation/experiment discrepancies within the experimental uncertainty. These results highlight that the 56Fe cross sections in the JEFF3.1.1 library have been evaluated accurately.