ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Erin D. Fichtl, James S. Warsa, Jeffery D. Densmore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 165 | Number 3 | July 2010 | Pages 331-341
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-51
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Under some circumstances, spatial discretizations of the SN transport equation will lead to negativity in the scalar flux; therefore, negative-flux fixup schemes are often employed to ensure that the flux is positive. The nonlinear nature of these schemes precludes the use of powerful linear iterative solvers such as Krylov methods; thus, solutions are generally computed using so-called source iteration (SI), which is a simple fixed-point iteration. In this paper, we use Newton's method to solve fixed-source SN transport problems with negative-flux fixup, for which the analytic form of the Jacobian is shown to be nonsingular. It is necessary to invert the Jacobian at each Newton iteration. Generally, an exact inversion is prohibitively expensive and furthermore is not necessary for convergence of Newton's method. In the inexact Newton-Krylov method, the Jacobian is inverted using a Krylov method, which completes at some prescribed tolerance. This tolerance may be quite large in the initial stages of the Newton iteration. In this paper, we compare the use of the exact Jacobian with two approximations of the Jacobian in the inexact Newton-Krylov method. The first approximation is a finite difference approximation. The second is that used in the Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) method, which performs a finite difference approximation without actually generating the Jacobian itself. Numerical results comparing standard SI with the three methods demonstrate that Newton-Krylov can outperform SI, particularly for diffusive materials. The results also show that the additional level of approximation introduced by the JFNK approach does not adversely affect convergence, indicating that JFNK will be robust and efficient in large-scale applications.