ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DNFSB’s Summers ends board tenure, extending agency’s loss of quorum
Lee
Summers
The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, the independent agency responsible for ensuring that Department of Energy facilities are protective of public health and safety, announced that the board’s acting chairman, Thomas Summers, has concluded his service with the agency, having completed his second term as a board member on October 18.
Summers’ departure leaves Patricia Lee, who joined the DNFSB after being confirmed by the Senate in July 2024, as the board’s only remaining member and acting chair. Lee’s DNFSB board term ends in October 2027.
J. P. Lestone, C. R. Bates, M. B. Chadwick, M. W. Paris
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 80 | Number 1 | October 2024 | Pages S72-S88
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2024.2334973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
While studying d(d,n)3He fusion in 1938, Ruhlig observed protons with energies larger than 15 MeV. Ruhlig suggested that these high-energy protons were generated by tritium-on-deuterium fusion neutrons scattering protons out of a thin cellophane foil placed inside a cloud chamber. This led Ruhlig to hypothesize that he was observing secondary (in-flight) tritium-on-deuterium fusions and conclude that the d(t,n) reaction “must be an exceedingly probable one.” This was the first attempt to quantify the probability of d(t,n) fusion, using the ~1-MeV tritons generated by d(d,p)t fusion. This caused some Manhattan Project scientists to suggest that the d(t,n) cross sections are significantly higher than those for deuteron-on-deuterium fusion and led to the first measurement of d(3He,p) and d(t,n) cross sections in 1943. Here, we have used modern cross sections and stopping powers to estimate the expected numbers of high-energy protons associated with in-flight d(t,n) reactions in Ruhlig’s experiment. Our estimate is four orders of magnitude lower than Ruhlig’s observed rate. However, the number of high-energy protons in Ruhlig’s experiment can be obtained via simulation if the protons are assumed to have been emitted by secondary in-flight d(3He,p) reactions, with various plausible assumptions about the experimental geometry and target-backing thickness. Our calculations demonstrate that quantitative information about the fusion of A = 3 ions with deuterium could have been obtained via experiments similar to Ruhlig’s well in advance of the advent of 3He ion and triton beams in 1943. This opportunity seems to have been missed.