ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Kentucky disburses $10M in nuclear grants
The Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority (KNEDA) recently distributed its first awards through the new Nuclear Energy Development Grant Program, which was established last year. In total, KNEDA disbursed $10 million to a variety of companies that will use the funding to support siting studies, enrichment supply-chain planning, workforce training, and curriculum development.
Haozhe Qiu, Kun Lu, Xiaojun Ni, Jianghua Wei, Songbo Han
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 78 | Number 8 | November 2022 | Pages 676-682
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2022.2103312
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The vacuum vessel is the core component of the Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor (CFETR); its main function is to remove nuclear heating, provide safety shielding, and maintain a high-quality vacuum environment. Therefore, the safety of the vacuum vessel is of great significance to the CFETR, and examining its dynamic performance is necessary. However, the conventional finite element method takes too long to perform the dynamic analysis of the vacuum vessel, which greatly reduces the efficiency of the design and analysis. Based on the modal synthesis method, this study uses ANSYS software to establish a substructure model of the CFETR vacuum vessel. A modal analysis and harmonic response analysis are conducted, and their results are compared with those of the conventional finite element model. The results show that the substructure model not only has the same accuracy as conventional finite element models, but that it also greatly reduces the time of dynamic calculation.