ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Westinghouse teams with Nordion and PSEG to produce Co-60 at Salem
Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear announced on Tuesday the signing of long-term agreements to establish the first commercial-scale production of cobalt-60 in a U.S. nuclear reactor. Under the agreements, the companies are to apply newly developed production technology for pressurized water reactors to produce Co-60 at PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey.
Alex Aimetta, Nicolò Abrate, Sandra Dulla, Antonio Froio
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 78 | Number 4 | May 2022 | Pages 275-290
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2021.2003151
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutronic modeling of fusion machines requires a detailed representation of their complex geometry in order to properly evaluate various parameters of interest such as energy deposition and tritium production in the breeding blanket. In this work, the neutronics of the Affordable, Robust, Compact (ARC) fusion reactor is modeled with the Monte Carlo particle transport code Serpent developed at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland as an alternative to other, more established, tools in the fusion community such as the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP) code. The tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and the power deposited by neutrons and photons inside the breeding blanket of ARC are evaluated. Considerations related to activation of materials and to neutron shielding are not taken into account. As a first step, estimations have been obtained adopting a spatially uniform neutron source inside the plasma chamber. A second set of calculations has been performed considering a nonuniform source that takes into account a more realistic neutron generation distribution, with higher values at the center of the plasma and reduced rates toward the plasma edge. The results obtained with Serpent have been compared with available literature values for the TBR and the power deposition, confirming that Serpent can be considered a suitable alternative code for the neutronic analysis of fusion reactors like ARC. The TBR presented in this paper (1.0853) is in good agreement with the value found in the literature, with a relative difference of 0.49%. The total power deposition has a maximum relative difference of 12% for the components of interest in the present work.