ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Paul W. Humrickhouse, Brad J. Merrill, Su-Jong Yoon, Lee C. Cadwallader
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 75 | Number 8 | November 2019 | Pages 973-1001
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1658464
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this work we consider some of the safety implications of using liquid metal (LM) plasma-facing components (PFCs) in future fusion reactors. Candidate LMs include lithium, tin, and tin-lithium alloys, and we consider a modified Fusion Nuclear Science Facility design with a dual-cooled lead-lithium blanket and fast-flowing LM first wall and divertor consisting of each of these aforementioned metals. Tin and tin-lithium PFCs are found to have little impact on the potential source terms, including tritium and activation product releases during an accident as well as tritium permeation losses during normal operation, relative to the lead-lithium blanket. For a lithium PFC, chemical reactivity and high tritium inventories are additional concerns. We outline some necessary safety precautions for lithium systems and review the relevant operating experience of sodium-cooled fission reactors. Design constraints to keep the tritium inventory low in such a lithium system are outlined, including in the tritium extraction system, which will have to rely on different techniques than envisioned for other LMs such as PbLi, Sn, and SnLi, which have a much lower tritium solubility than lithium. Development of such extraction systems is significant research and development needed prior to deployment of lithium PFCs.