ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Isolation validates its disposal canister for TRISO spent fuel
Nuclear waste disposal technology company Deep Isolation announced it has successfully completed Project PUCK, a government-funded initiative to demonstrate the feasibility and potential commercial readiness of its Universal Canister System (UCS) to manage TRISO spent nuclear fuel.
Jason Wilson, James Becnel, David Demange, Bernice Rogers
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 75 | Number 8 | November 2019 | Pages 794-801
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1642089
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ITER fuel cycle is composed of a tokamak and several systems that will support the preparation of fuel, the handling of exhaust gases, and the recycle of unused fuel back to the tokamak. Deuterium and tritium (DT) isotopes are supplied to the tokamak. A key need for such separations arises from the fact that, of the DT fed to the ITER tokamak, only a small fraction burns. The unburned DT exits the tokamak along with impurity gases. The impurities are a rather complicated mixture including helium ash, non-DT gases injected into the tokamak, species originating from chemical reactions, and species originating from nuclear reactions. Exhaust gases from the torus are collected by pumps, which move the exhaust material to the tokamak exhaust process (TEP) system. The TEP system performs chemical separations on ITER fuel cycle process streams. The TEP recovers hydrogen isotopes from impurities such as argon, nitrogen, water, ammonia, and hydrocarbons. The TEP sends the hydrogen isotopes for subsequent processing to the isotope separation system or the storage and delivery system. At the same time, an impurity gas stream of extremely low tritium content (less than 8.88 TBq of tritium per day) is sent to the detritiation system. Since the TEP system completed conceptual design in 2010, the overall ITER design has advanced on a number of fronts. These advancements have affected the interfacing systems and operational scenarios that could have affected the design of the TEP system. The interfacing and operational changes were examined and new performance requirements for the TEP were determined. The TEP design was evaluated to determine if the design was flexible and robust enough to meet the performance and discharge requirements.