ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Mikio Enoeda, Yosihiro Ohara, Nicole Roux, Alice Ying, Giovanni Pizza, Siegfried Malang
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 39 | Number 2 | March 2001 | Pages 612-616
Fusion Materials | doi.org/10.13182/FST01-A11963305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective thermal conductivity of the pebble beds is one the most important design parameters for pebble bed solid breeder blanket. In the framework of IEA Implementing Agreement on Solid Breeder Subtask Group, measurement of pebble bed thermal conductivity by the hot wire method were defined as one of tasks to provide comparative information on the effective thermal conductivity of candidate ceramic pebble beds for DEMO blanket designs and ITER breeding blanket design. The authors previously reported the preliminary result of the pebble bed thermal conductivity for Li2O, Be and Al2O3. This paper presents the result of Li2TiO3, Li2ZrO3 (1 mm diameter) from CEA, and Li4SiO4 (0.25 - 0.63 mm diameter) from FZK.
Observation was compared to the correlations, SZB model and HM model. Contact area fraction was obtained by correlation fitting, of which the value is 4.9×10−3 for Li2TiO3, Li2ZrO3 (the same value as Li2O) and 1×10−6 for and Li4SiO4.