ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Satoshi Suzuki, Kazuyoshi Sato, Masanori Araki, Kazuyuki Nakamura, Masayuki Dairaku, Kenji Yokoyama, Masato Akiba
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | December 1996 | Pages 793-797
Plasma-Facing Components: Analysis and Technology | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A11963033
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Since the thermal loads causes deformation of the divertor plate, it is one of the critical issues to develop support structures which can suppress the deformation within an allowable tolerance. Slide support structures and rigid support structures have been proposed for the ITER divertor plate design. Advantage of the fully rigid support structure is 1) the thermal deformation can almost fully be suppressed, 2) the fabrication process becomes simpler than the slide support structures. However, stresses/strains of the divertor plate with the rigid support structure are seemed to be much higher than those of the slide support structures. To evaluate the thermal fatigue behavior for the rigid support structure, the authors have developed a 1 m long divertor mock-up and have performed the thermal cycling experiments of the mock-up. The mock-up consists of 36 armor tiles, a soft copper (OFHC-Cu) heat sink, and an OFHC-Cu cooling tube. The armor tiles were made of a unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Carbon composite material which has high thermal conductivity perpendicular to the coolant flow direction. The saddle-shaped armor tiles were brazed onto the heat sink with a silver braze. The thermal cycling experiment was performed in an area of 25 × 50 mm2 at an incident heat flux of 25 MW/m2 for a pulse duration of 10 s. As a result, a water leakage from the cooling tube between the heated armor tiles occurred at 1247th thermal cycle. In the scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation, the striation which is typical for fatigue cracking was clearly observed at the fracture surface of the cooling tube. The 3-D finite element analysis for the simulation of the experiment was also performed, and the large strain amplitude was found at the heated side of the cooling tube. Therefore, the fatigue cracking of the cooling tube could mainly be attributable to this large strain amplitude. To realize the rigid support structure, more stiffness is required for the structural material of the cooling tube.