ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
M. Tobin, V. Karpenko, A. Burnham, R. Peterson
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | December 1996 | Pages 457-463
National Ignition Facility | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A11962983
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The National Ignition Facility (NIF) will be configured in its baseline design to achieve ignition and gain using the indirect drive approach. However, the NIF primary criteria and functional requirements require the NIF design “to not preclude” the ability to conduct inertial confinement fusion experiments using the direct drive approach.
The direct drive approach requires symmetrical illumination of an inertial confinement fusion (ICF) capsule where each beam fully subtends the capsule. Therefore, the re-directing of 24 of the 48 NIF beamlines (each consisting of a 2 × 2 beamlet group) from ~30° and ~50° cone angles to ~75° cone angles located near the chamber ‘equator’ is required. This would be accomplished by adjusting intermediate transport mirrors such that the beams would intercept different final mirrors in the Target Bay and be directed into final optics assemblies attached to the chamber at the new port locations. Allowing space to be able to convert from one irradiation scheme to another while fully meeting the mechanical stability requirements for each approach is a significant challenge. Additionally, NIF user needs (features supporting weapons physics, weapons effects, inertial fusion energy, or Basic Energy Sciences) cannot be compromised by direct drive needs.
The target for direct drive, absent a hohlraum, emits much fewer cold x rays than in the indirect drive case. Further, the irradiation scheme, by its nature, may not result in the absorption of all of the 3ω light and therefore could create a unique hazard to the NIF chamber first wall of significant fluences of scattered UV laser light. This paper describes possible design features of the NIF Target Area to allow conversion to a direct drive capability, and discusses some of the differences in post-shot conditions created compared to indirect drive.