ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
INL makes first fuel for Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment
Idaho National Laboratory has announced the creation of the first batch of enriched uranium chloride fuel salt for the Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment (MCRE). INL said that its fuel production team delivered the first fuel salt batch at the end of September, and it intends to produce four additional batches by March 2026. MCRE will require a total of 72–75 batches of fuel salt for the reactor to go critical.
V. Novikov, B. Wahlström
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 4 | December 1991 | Pages 518-523
Overview/Energy Policy | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A11946893
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is of vital importance that all lessons from the first phase of nuclear power development are utilized in the planning of emerging nuclear systems. Nuclear power seems to have turned unacceptable in spite of its early promises. The prevailing view among experts is however that the public concerns are possible to approach with technological and institutional solutions. Before this view can be communicated to decision makers and the public it is necessary to learn the lessons from the twenty years of nuclear debate and from the TMI and Chernobyl accidents. The Chernobyl disaster brought the dangers of nuclear power concretely to common people. Increasing concerns for global warming is giving nuclear power a second chance to demonstrate its viability. In utilizing this second chance the industry should take due account of the arguments of the nuclear opposition. Social costs of an accident are very large and an accident anywhere will influence the whole industry. International cooperation is needed in assuring that all safety deficiencies are corrected. Coordinated approaches in informing the public are essential. The safety lessons should be integrated in evolutionary and revolutionary designs for new generations of power plants. The paper concludes with thoughts on how the problems of risk perception and social acceptance of nuclear power could be approached.